Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

¼¼Ä¡Á¦ ±¸°æÅ©±â¿Í Â¥´Â ¹æ¹ý¿¡ µû¸¥ ¸¸ 3¡­5¼¼ ¾Æµ¿ÀÇ ÀÏȸ ¼¼Ä¡Á¦ »ç¿ë·® Á¶»ç

The amount of toothpaste varies with opening diameter and squeezing methods in children aged 3~5

´ëÇѱ¸°­º¸°ÇÇÐȸÁö 2010³â 34±Ç 2È£ p.134 ~ 138
¼ÕÁ¤Èñ, ¸¶µæ»ó,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
¼ÕÁ¤Èñ ( Son Jung-Hui ) - ´ë¿ø´ëÇÐ Ä¡À§»ý°ú
¸¶µæ»ó ( Ma Deuk-Sang ) - °­¸ª¿øÁÖ´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¿¹¹æÄ¡Çб³½Ç

Abstract


Objectives. The purpose of this study was to assess and compare the amount of toothpaste used by varying opening diameter and squeezing methods in children aged 3¡­5 to prevent the excessive use of fluoride toothpaste.

Methods. The amount of toothpaste per brushing was measured from a sample of 176 infants aged 3¡­5 in 6 nurseries located in Jecheon City, Chungbuk Province, Korea. We tested two squeezing methods, pea-size and transverse technique, and two openings, 0.6 cm and 0.9 cm. We compared the amount of toothpaste used relative to opening diameter and squeezing methods through paired t-test using SPSS 14.0.

Results. For 0.6 cm or 0.9 cm diameters with the pea-size method, the amount of toothpaste used was 0.22 g or 0.51 g, respectively (p£¼0.001). For 0.6 cm or 0.9 cm diameters and the transverse technique, the amount of toothpaste used was 0.20 g or 0.46 g, respectively (p£¼0.001). In case of 0.9 cm diameter, the amount of toothpaste showed significant difference according to squeezing methods (0.9 cm: p=0.045, 0.6 cm: p=0.121).

Conclusions. Smaller openings restrict the amount of toothpaste used and would reduce unnecessary fluoride ingestion.

Å°¿öµå

±¸°æÅ©±â; ºÒ¼Ò¼¼Ä¡Á¦; ¼¼Ä¡Á¦ »ç¿ë·®; Â¥´Â ¹æ¹ý
fluoride; opening diameter; squeezing method; toothpaste

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed